News: Cheap Karela Buy Menosan Buy Dospan Omnicef Purchase Rhinocort Purchase Cordarone Clarinex Buy Feldene Order Mentat Purchase Clomid Buy Cephalexin Buy Vasodilan Order Shoot Diovan Combivent Purchase Lisinopril Butalbital ActoPlus Met Purchase Mobic Buy Arimidex Order Monoket Zestril Purchase Deltasone Cheap Superman Order Plavix Order Zyprexa Buy Speman Order Naprosyn Order Purinethol Cheap Cardizem Lopressor Purchase Shoot Order Avandamet Buy Amaryl Cheap Topamax Cheap Prevacid Superman Order Crestor Buy Lanoxin Order Casodex Prograf Purchase Zocor Order Tulasi Order Confido Purchase AyurSlim Order Prozac Flovent Cheap Adipex Cheap Loprox Ultimate Male Cheap Prozac Buy Bupropion Buy Aleve Order Antabuse Viagra Soft Cheap Diabecon Buy Elimite Order Serophene Zerit Rogaine Buy Butalbital Cheap Isoptin Purchase Noroxin Order Lexapro Women Attracting Buy Avapro Order Trazodone Prozac Order Tenuate Ultram Buy Himcolin Cheap Aleve Purchase Zovirax Buy Tenuate Purchase Levaquin Tramadol Order V-Gel Purchase Motrin Buy Zithromax Buy Desyrel Order Celebrex Cheap Deltasone Order Hyzaar Cheap Ophthacare Purchase Depakote Order Didronel Cheap Accupril Purchase Zyloprim Order Phentermine Purchase StretchNil Purchase Aleve Cheap Vasotec Revia Nolvadex Purchase Trandate Buy Lasix Order Combivent Order Evista Cheap Himplasia Buy Allegra Aciphex Order Lotensin Buy Tramadol Lisinopril Buy Brite Cheapest Generic Purchase Actos Order Coreg Cheap Mexitil Buy Septilin Aristocort Allegra Buy Clomid Order Exelon Buy Isordil Cheap Zyloprim Cheap Depakote Order Famvir Cheap Biaxin Cheap Oxytrol Buy Antabuse Buy Synthroid Cheap Evista Hydrocodone Buy Nonoxinol Cheap Bactroban Cheap Levlen Buy Singulair Buy Hyzaar Buy Tablet Order Copegus Cheap Avandamet Ambien Buy Acomplia Order Revia Purchase Sorbitrate Buying Alprazolam Purchase Prandin Cymbalta Buy Online Order Liv.52 Purchase Tenormin Buy Effexor Order Zimulti Purchase Diazepam Sarafem Purchase Differin Purchase Lamisil Cheap Purim Purchase Bontril Purchase Ansaid Buy Zyvox Purchase Methocarbam Danazol Buy Lynoral Order Snoroff Purchase Calan Zocor Cheap Zithromax Buy Diovan Purchase Naprosyn Purchase Phentrimine Buy Percocet Purchase Brahmi Cheap Lotrisone Buy Phentermine Vasodilan Order Codeine Cheap Emsam Serophene Buy Mysoline Buy Requip Purchase Nolvadex Ordering Adipex Coreg Cheap Lopressor Endep Diabecon Claritin Order Motrin Tenormin Cheap Lopid Order Septilin Liv.52 Mentax Purchase Quibron-T Order Hydrocodone Cheap Vasodilan Buy Naprosyn Vytorin Purchase Lotensin Order Vytorin Valium Order Imitrex Order Fioricet Order Pravachol Cheap Diflucan Purchase Abana Purchase Accupril Bactroban Rhinocort Buy Loxitane Purchase Leukeran Purchase Zantac Order Brite Purchase Proscar Cheap Accutane Karela Buy Pamelor Order Sorbitrate Purchase Adderall Vicodin Order Tramadol Cheap Lorazepam Order Reosto Detrol Herbal Maxx Zyrtec Lasix Purchase Loprox Adalat Cheap Soma Buy Hydrocodone Wellbutrin SR Professional Plasma Cheap Altace Miacalcin Norvasc Purchase Procardia Buy Darvocet Buy Ansaid Buy Koflet Order High Cheapest Valium Buy Celexa Order Prandin Buy Ventolin Purchase Allegra Purchase Aricept Cheap Endep Buy Risperdal Cheap Diovan Purchase Rocaltrol Acyclovir Order Mentax Dilantin Cheap Celebrex Buy Zyrtec Order Percocet Zyban Mexitil Buy Shoot Order Meridia Cheap Aciphex Purchase Zyban Purchase Prometrium Purchase Vasodilan Cheap Cipro Buy Alprazolam Pravachol Buy Zerit Buy Ambien Purchase Koflet Buy Plendil Purchase Mexitil Lozol Bonnisan Order Aristocort Buy Brahmi Buy Casodex Purchase Prevacid Buy Pravachol Cheap Geriforte Propecia Accupril Buying Adipex Buy Renalka Order Evecare Buy Zimulti Order Zantac Antabuse Buy Famvir Order Acomplia Emsam Phentrimine Cheap Methocarbam Cheap Brite Cheap Rumalaya Cheap Abana Order Coumadin Cheap Combivent Purchase Maxaquin Exelon Cheap Nimotop Cheap Cialis Motrin Cheap Himcolin Cyklokapron Order Pamelor Purchase Mevacor Cheap Aceon Purchase Lortab StretchNil Starlix Purchase Sinequan Purchase Geodon Purchase Urispas Buy Norco Buy Sumycin Buy Sustiva Elavil Cheap Diakof Cheap Levothroid Order Synthroid Purchase Diovan Purchase Septilin Order Brahmi Nicotinell Order Singulair Buy Bactroban Cheap Sustiva Cheap Cystone Buy Geodon Cheap Lisinopril Order Requip Lopid Pulmicort Inhaler Buy Prescriptions Purchase Parlodel Purchase Premarin Purchase Acomplia Cheap Sorbitrate Cheap Avapro Order Lamictal Order Keftab Cheap Acyclovir Order Miacalcin Cheap Proscar Arava Buy Lamictal Cheap Prandin Cheap Penisole Buy Detrol Purchase Lasuna Rumalaya Purchase Acyclovir Buy Parlodel Cheap Pletal Carisoprodol Order Zanaflex Buy Prinivil Purchase Celebrex Order Herbolax Purchase Adalat Buy Zovirax Cheap Styplon Order Zestril Purchase Cephalexin Buy Vasotec Purchase Mycelex-G Purchase Danazol Purchase Stromectol Purchase Styplon Cheap Amoxil Purchase Augmentin Buy Clarina Purchase Revia Purchase Viagra Stromectol Cheap Eurax Differin Buy Premarin Cheap Paxil Buy Rogaine Cheap Bupropion Order Parlodel Purchase Kamagra Procardia Triphala Abana Cheap Coumadin Buy Coumadin Order Flomax Order Xanax Purchase Cyklokapron Order Proventil Purchase Buspar Cheap Zestril Buy Arava Capoten Buy Prozac Order Geodon Hytrin Buy Stromectol Buy Evecare SleepWell (Herbal Loprox Order Valium Order Adipex Buying Xanax Buy Herbolax Purchase Plan Order Cardura Cheap Retin-A Order Loprox Cheap Xeloda Singulair Cheap Menosan Purchase Effexor Purchase High Purchase Lariam Order Lanoxin Purchase Neurontin Purchase Avodart Purchase Avandamet Order Isoptin Order Shallaki Order Superman Cheap Trimox Buy Prograf Buy Trazodone Mobic Order Atacand Order Clomid Buy Hydrochloride Renalka Buy Penisole Cheap Phentrimine Cheap Danazol Cheap StretchNil Purchase Ashwagandha Buy Aceon Percocet Cheap Atarax Buy Trandate Order Vasotec Buy Omnicef Zantac Buy Cystone Cheap AyurSlim Cheap Trandate Buy AyurSlim Cystone Purchase Tramadol Buy Abana Buy Hytrin Sumycin Buy Procardia Buy Rimonabant Buy Lamisil Nizoral Confido Reosto Purchase Nizoral Kamagra Keftab Buy Pilex Buy Diethylpropion V-Gel Parlodel Deltasone Biaxin Isoptin Purchase Nonoxinol Lincocin Order Inderal Purchase Kytril Order Allegra Order Diovan Cheap Premarin Plan B Effexor Cheap V-Gel Order Cytotec Cheap Flexeril Order Bactroban Buy Atrovent Buy Eurax Buying Didrex Buy Lasuna Retin-A Order Levitra Buy Norvasc Order Diflucan Zovirax Relafen Buy Fioricet Male Enhancement Synthroid Cheap Acticin Zyvox Order Biaxin Xenacore Purchase Coumadin Buy Effects Order Ashwagandha Cheap Motrin Isordil Purchase Inderal Buy Adipex Buy Nexium Trimox Buy Flexeril Oxycontin Order Accupril Cheap Famvir Order Glucophage Purchase Pamelor Cheap Aristocort Vitamin A Purchase Bupropion Buy Kamagra Lorazepam Cheap Leukeran Purchase Cardura Cheap Antabuse Buy Claritin Cheap Snoroff Cheap Nolvadex Order Actos Bontril Purchase Snoroff Order Rocaltrol Buy Copegus Plavix Cheap Casodex Prandin Order Hytrin Cheap Sinequan Order Cystone Purchase Capoten Buy Clonazepam Order Flovent Buy Ophthacare Purchase Hyzaar Purchase Relafen Buy Didrex Hoodia Cheap Singulair Buy Miacalcin Viramune Purchase Accutane Cheap Cephalexin Cheap Geodon Order Aricept Cheap Zerit Buy Bonnisan Order Himcocid Zimulti Buy Femara Himcospaz Trazodone Brafix Lanoxin Order Aceon Acticin Buy Exelon Buy Triphala Purchase Brafix Order Nonoxinol Order Nicotinell Order Cipro Order Calan Trandate Prednisone Buy Reosto Purchase Avapro Cheap Confido Purchase Prednisone Order Proscar Order Zocor Buy Flomax Topamax Cheap Capoten Cheap Allegra Order Oxycontin Didronel Purchase Tricor Order Zelnorm Purchase Prograf Cheap Tramadol Buy Lopressor Cheap Viagra Buy Propecia Cheap Hydrocodone Order Stromectol Buy Zetia Clomid Cheap Lasix Cheap Proventil Cheap Hoodia Purchase Lamictal Paxil Order Capoten Purchase Rumalaya Purchase Evista Order Geriforte Cheap Dilantin Purchase Lanoxin Cheap Kytril Order Lotrisone Purchase Atrovent Buy Prometrium Cheap Elimite Mycelex-G Cheap Adderall Cheap Rocaltrol Buy Protonix Purchase Triphala Buy Lipitor Risperdal Order Atrovent Diet Maxx Buy Kytril Order Prinivil Cheap Xanax Purchase Cardizem Atrovent Cheap Rogaine Herbolax Desyrel Quibron-T Order Elavil Clonazepam Buy Drug Cheap Cardura Order Norvasc Cheap Lukol Cheap Azulfidine Cephalexin Order Arava Casodex Purchase Famvir Lamisil Nexium Order Avandia Cheap Micardis Order Himcospaz Buy Danazol Order Ultram Meridia Cheap Miacalcin Purchase Myambutol Purchase Himplasia Cheap Lanoxin Purchase Meridia Cheap Prograf Buy Accutane Buy Plavix Cheap Atacand Purchase Diarex Cozaar Order Augmentin Purchase Plavix Buy Snoroff Purchase Sarafem Cheap Fosamax Buy Lozol Order Lamisil Buy Bontril Cheap Flovent Order Noroxin Altace Buy Aciphex Order Retin-A Cheap Actos Order Nizoral Nimotop Purchase Flexeril Inderal Cheap Zebeta Order Claritin Cheap Bonnisan Order Cephalexin Gasex Cheap Nonoxinol Cheap Buspar Order Depakote Order Azulfidine Buy Dostinex Buy Nicotinell Order Sarafem Diakof Cheap Vicodin Purchase Fioricet Purchase Purinethol Order Deltasone Buy Acticin Order Lioresal Cytotec Hoodia Weight Buy Clarinex Purchase Femara Order Pilex Naprosyn Cheap Zovirax Cheap Calan Order Bupropion Oxytrol Buying Viagra Buy Capoten Purchase Evecare Viagra Jelly Purchase Prinivil Cheap Ultram
News Blogs: News Cheap pharmacy shop auto-moto Boats Trousers Phentermine No Prescription Intimate goods Hydrocodone online Ladies handbag Loan Online Best Ringtones Balans Building materials Adipex online Xanax online Yachts Medicine news Cheap drugs online shop Underwear Chronometer Ambien online Fioricet online Tunings Ornaments Sale Auto Free Ringtones Replica Rolex Sport Betting Necklace Medical tests Credit Boots furniture Vicodin online Online notebook shop Free mp3 ringtones Blog Search the Web Top casino ya.by Green Card Information Ear rings Bracelets mp3 music for mobile Fashions Cigarette Top auto-moto Cialis online Download Ringtones Rington Credits Phentermine online Cigarettes Tramadol online Dating Get ringtones online Free Ringtones

ASK SMARTMONIES WEEK 3

July 18th, 2008

Each week smartmonies will answer a few questions on sports or sports capping. we will post the Q & A in this blog. simply email smartmonies at smartmonies@gmail.com by Thursday.

 

1) Q: Smartmonies, in your opinion what team is the best SB winning team of all time? Can you rank them for me?

Shawn , Dallas TX

smartmonies: Good question Shawn, good question. I will only go back to the late 70’s. The 5 yard chuck rule was put into place and that set into motion the evolvement of the modern day passing game. Without crunching too many numbers, lets use ”yards per Play differential” to rank the SB winning teams. Yards per play differential is simply the amount of offensive Yards per play average minus a teams defensive yards per play average. So for example, lets say a team averages 5.5 yards per play for the season and  they allow defensively 4.5 yards per play, then their Yards per play differential would be +1.0. The higher that differential, typically the better. Here are all SB winning teams since 1979 ranked according to yards per play differential.

 1999 RAMS     6.5 4.7 = +1.8
1979 STEELERS 5.8 4.1 = +1.7
1989 49ERS    6.1 4.7 = +1.4
1991 REDSKINS 5.8 4.5 = +1.3
1996 PACKERS  5.3 4.2 = +1.1
1992 COWBOYS  5.5 4.5 = +1.0
1988 49ERS    5.5 4.5 = +1.0
1998 BRONCOS  5.9 4.9 = +1.0
1985 BEARS    5.4 4.4 = +1.0
1984 49ERS    6.0 5.0 = +1.0
1994 49ERS    5.8 4.9 = +.9
1993 COWBOYS  5.6 4.7 = +.9
2005 STEELERS 5.4 4.6 = +.8
1995 COWBOYS  5.8 5.0 = +.8
2002 TAMPABAY 4.9 4.2 = +.7
1987 REDSKINS 5.6 4.9 = +.7
1997 BRONCOS  5.5 4.9 = +.6
1983 RAIDERS  5.2 4.6 = +.6
2006 COLTS    6.0 5.0 = +.5
1982 REDSKINS 5.0 4.6 = +.4
1990 GIANTS   5.0 4.6 = +.4
2000 RAVENS   4.7 4.3 = +.4
2004 PATRIOTS 5.5 5.0 = +.4
2003 PATRIOTS 4.8 4.4 = +.4
1981 49ERS    5.0 4.7 = +.3
1986 GIANTS   5.0 4.8 = +.2
2008 GIANTS   5.1 5.0 = +.1
1980 RAIDERS  4.8 4.7 = +.1
2001 PATRIOTS 4.9 5.3 = -.4

According to Yards per play differential, the Rams of 1999 were the best SB winning team for a single season. The 2001 Patriots were the only team that finished the regular season with a negative differential. They are the worst SB winning team since 1979. It is amazing what you can get accomplished with a video camera and a  genius named Ernie.

 

2) Q: Why are you so high on Aaron Rodgers?

Darren, Madison Wisconsin

Smatmonies: Poise, poise & more poise.  For the few times that I have seen Aaron play, I have noticed his poise and field awareness. He also had a nice Yards per pass average in the Dallas game. I think this is why the Packers are having a tough time. If Kyle Boller was the QB, Favre would be the starter, no questions asked.  But I think the Packers organization believe they have found their next quality QB that could be around for years to come. I am inclined to agree. I think Rodgers is the real deal. You don’t want to pull the plug on him now and make him sit for another year just so you can allow the aging vet to continue with his playing addiction. If you do that, Rogers will could end up leaving next year via free agency. At which point the fans will be complaining about their future QB outlook. Trade Favre to Baltimore and end this thing. 

3) Q: How do the young Studs (crosby and Malkin) match up to Mario Lemieux?

Garry, Norfolk Virginia 

 

Smartmonies: It is an exciting time to be a Penguins fan, and you mention the reasons. But it is not fair to compare either of them to Mario Lemieux. Probably the most underated season for any athlete was Mario’s 1989 season. He had 200 points with basically no one of any note on either side of him. Consider this stat for a minute. During that season, Lemieux finished with  a 27% shooting percentage. Another words, for every 4 shots he took, he made a goal. This isn’t basketball. They have a goalie in front of the net. This is an absolutely ridiculously good shooting percentage for a season. Consider that a year ago Crosby finished the season with a 14% shooting percentage. Chew on that for a while. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

What went wrong with the New Orleans Saints in 2007?

July 16th, 2008

Week 1 Saints Lose to Colts

“Our inability to convert third downs and keep the ball hurt us,” said sean Payton. (Brees also had 2 interceptions)

Manning = 9.6 Yards per attempt
Brees = 4.7 Yards Per Attempt

—————————————————————————————————-

week 2 Saints LOSe to Bucs

The Saints had some success moving the ball on the ground early.”I think we have the ability to be a very good offense. One of the best, if not the best, in the league. Unfortunately we’re not playing like it right now,” said Drew Brees.

Box score

Saints 0 , 0 , 7, 7, (Zero 1st half points by the offense)

Brees 1 interception

Jeff Garcia = 15.2 Yards per attempt
Drew Brees = 5.3 Yards per attempt
——————————————————–

Week 3 Saints Lose to Titans

Drew Brees  had another miserable game, he had five turnovers. Brees now has just 1 TD pass versus 7 Interceptions on the season.

Vince Young = 7.2 Yards per Attempt
Drew Brees = 4.7 Yards per Attempt

—————————————————————
WEEK 4 BYE
—————————————————————-

Week 5 Saints lose to Panthers

If we continue to make the dumb mistakes, then it’s hard for the result to change,” said Saints coach Sean Payton. In a tightly contested affair, the Saints only could muster 6 first half points. They also failed to score in the 4th Quarter.

David Carr = 7.8 Yards per Attempt
Drew Brees = 5.4 Yards per attempt (2 more interceptions)

—————————————————————

Brees inefficiency in the 1st half of games, disallowed the Saints to take leads and then run the ball in the 2nd halfs to eat clock. Their paltry rushing yard total had more to do with Drew Brees then one might be led to believe.

While Reggie Bush only averaged 3.8 yards per carry on the season, he did average 4.4 yards per rush up the middle. The Saints graded #1 in the NFL last year between the guards (up the middle). The loss of Center Jeff Faine to the Bucs via free agency looms large.

Smartmonies

 

 

 

 

Saints Begin season 0-4, a typical graveyard start for playoff hopeful teams.

Ask Smartmonies week 2

July 11th, 2008

Each week you can email  smartmonies  at smartmonies@gmail.com with a sports or sports handicapping question. Each friday afternoon he will choose a few questions to answer.

1) smartmonies, what is the difference with the Pirate hitters this year? Can they continue scoring runs at this pace?

Todd, State College PA  

Answer: Besides the obvious addition of Nate Mclouth, there is 1 stat you can point to.

The following stats are NL  teams with “runners in scoring postion

http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/stats/byteam?cat=Situational&cut_type=185&sort=722&conference=NL&year=season_2008

As you can see, the Bucs have nearly a 30 point lead in batting average when they have runners in scoring position. With their atrocious pitching staff, this timely hitting better continue. I doubt it will however.

————————————————————————————–

2) Dutch, I’m heading to Las Vegas on July 19th. Do you have any NFL future picks that your looking at?

Brian, Miam FL

Answer: Last year we did very well with future picks. The Packers over 7.5 wins my best pick. I’m going back to the well again. Here is a look at what I have so far.
 

GREEN BAY   OVER 8.5 WINS    ****TOP PICK**** 
The above is what I like to call “free money
 

The rest of the picks
 

TEXANS 0VER 7.5 WINS  
Shaub was averaging 8 yards per pass until his receiver and RB got injured.
 

CLOWNS  Under 8 wins
 Offense will have been studied and Defensive secondary is atrocious, (see Saints last season) I see 6-7 wins for the clowns.
 

RAVENS OVER 6 WINS

See 1992 Pittsburgh Steelers for More information, advise Ravens to win division at +850 odds )
 

STEELERS,  UNDER 9 WINS

 No depth on the Defensive line , terrible offensive line, worst special teams in the Buisiness. (Great Job Colbert, great Job)
 

 Lions , UNDER 6.5 wins
Firemattmillen .com (does that website still exist?)
 

 

 

——————————————————————————–
3) Dutch, I enjoy the radio show. When are you going to go to Pittsburgh and get a bigger gig?
Miguel , Morgantown WV  
   

I never went to school for journalism or broadcasting. I pretty much just do the radio show for fun cause of my passion for sports. I don’t even prepare much for the show. Just pretty much go on there and wing it for an hour.  I am glad you enjoy it however. Breaking into Pittsburgh would be tough. There is an old guard of media members that are a very tightly connected bunch. For a young guy to break into the group, it would take a great deal of ass kissing. And I simply don’t have the time to kiss Ass. But if you would like to hear me on a bigger station, just send email to Jim Graci at espn 1250 radio in Pittsburgh. He is the Program director. They recently fired Mark Madden. I am not sure that they have an adequate replacement for him. Let ESPN in Pittsburgh know that you like my show. Who knows what will happen. 

http://stations.espn.go.com/stations/espnradio1250/story?id=contactus

            

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ASK SMARTMONIES

July 4th, 2008

(each Friday smartmonies will take the time to answer 3 questions that was sent to him via email at smartmonies@gmail.com. Submit your questions by Thursday each week.

1) SMARTMONIES, THE BEN/PALMER STATS ARE NICE, BUT YOU FAIL TO MENTION BEN’S POOR PERFORMANCE IN THE PLAYOFFS AGAINST THE JAGUARS. WHY ARE YOU CHERRY PICKING ?

Mike, Hawaii

ANSWER: It is completely unfair to compare one QB’s playoff game performance to another QB that has failed in the regular season against weak teams such as the chiefs, 49ers etc, especially when his team was the favorite. Yes, its true Roethlisberger played a very poor first half in the playoff game against Jacksonville. But here is the thing.

His team was favored to lose in a playoff game. Comparing a QB’s performance to another’s is not accurate or fair when one QB was playing in a playoff game when his team was an underdog while the other QB played poorly in a regular season game when his team was a favorite. if you want to judge Roethlisberger accurately , then you must compare him to other great QB’s that were in the same situation. Below is a list of several great QB’s and their playoff records & passer ratings when their team was the UNDERDOG.

BRADY 5 GAMES TOTAL = 71% PASSER RATING RECORD 3-2

ROETH 3 GAMES TOTAL = 99% PASSER RATING RECORD 2-1

Pmann 5 GAMES TOTAL = 63% PASSER RATING RECORD 2-3

Montana 1 (since 86) = 34% passer rating RECORD 0-1

Marino 9 Games(86) = 71% Passer rating RECORD 3-6

ELWay 6 Games (86) = 61% Passer rating Record 1-4

As you can see that some of the best QB’s that ever laced them up, played poorly when their team was an underdog in the playoffs. Teams win championships. A QB can only do so much. In last years Steelers/Jags playoff game, the Jaguars were able to get a pass rush and stop the run with only having to rush 3 to 4 defensive players. They were able to drop the rest of the defense back into pass coverage. In cases like this, a QB needs time because with so many defenders playing pass coverage, and no one biting on play action , a QB needs to wait patiently for a receiver come open. But if the line isn’t able to block the few rushers , then that QB is dead. We saw that in the SB. The Patriots offensive line could not hold up to the Giants front four. This allowed the Giants to double up on Moss and put loads of defenders in the secondary. Brady did not have enough time to survey the field and go thru his reads. This also explains why the Steelers in the 70’s were so dominant. They had the best defensive front 4 in the history of the league. This allowed their Cornerbacks to play tight bump coverage on the receivers. The safety’s were able to double up on the wide outs and protect the deep ball. And linebackers like Jack Lambert were able to drop back into coverage and help in pass defense. They didn’t have to blitz to get a pass rush. This made it nearly impossible for offenses to execute.

———————————————————————————–

2) Dutch, who is the worst steeler QB in the last 30 years?

Jake, Johnstown Pa

Answer: Judging QB’s are always tough because they are all dealing with different surroundings. Some QB’s are in a better system with a better team. Hence they might end up with the much better career. But that doesn’t mean we can’t at least put together a list that makes sense. I often use the yards per pass stat to judge QB’s. I simply find yards per pass average to be the most telling stat. Now back to your question. Who is the worst Steeler QB in last 30 years? Having watched every Steeler game since the age of 4 (I will be 35 on July 5th, wow am I getting old) , if I were to just eyeball this question the names Mark Malone and Kent Graham come to mind. Malone was a completely inaccurate passer. His pass would often end up on the ground about 3 feet in front a receiver. He drove me nuts for about 5 years. Kent Graham was a complete statue who was also inaccurate. He did not last long as a Steeler QB. But he was pathetic. Now lets take a look at all former starting QB’s for the Steelers since Bradshaw played. Here is their yards per pass attempt average and completion percentage.

KENT GRAHAM 5.8 YPA 51.8% Completion percentage
MARK MALONE 6.1 YPA 50.5% JIM MILLER 6.1 YPA 58.3%
K STEWART 6.3 YPA 55.0% (see notes below on Stewart)
B BRISTER 6.5 YPA 54.0%
CLIFF STOUT 6.6 YPA 52.5%
DAVID WOODLEY 6.6 YPA 52.8%
TOMMY MADDOX 6.7 YPA 57.2%
MIKE TOMCZAK 6.9 YPA 53.4%
NEIL ODONNELL 6.7 YPA 57.8% (6.9 YPA with Steelers, fell dramatically with Jets)
T BRADSHAW 7.9 YPA 53.4% (these are the stats 77-81,modern pass defense penalties began, opened things up)
BRAD postseason 8.4 YPA 57.5% (he could play in the big game)
BEN ROETH 8.1 YPA 63%
BEN postseason 8.0 YPA 60.0%
Notes: Neil O’Donnell actually averaged 6.9 ypa with Steelers, but for 2 years with jets he collapsed to 6.1. Kordell Stewart is the one exception where YPA average should not necessarily be used as a ranking basis on his play. He brought completely added dimension with the Run game that elevated his importance and play making ability.

But as you can see, the YPA is very telling. It would be hard to argue against the accuracy of these rankings (with the Stewart exception of course). YPA is not everything. But It would be the first place I would look if you want to know how effective or non effective a QB is for your team.

3) What off-season Signing in the NHL do you think will pay dividends?

Jean, Ontario Canada

Answer: Detroit signed Marion Hossa. But I think their other signing will fall way under the radar until sometime next year. That is the signing of former backup goalie of the Penguins , Ty Conklin. Conklin signed on with Detroit for just about 700K more to be the backup for Chris Osgood. Mark these words right now. Ty Conklin will become the next great goalie for Detroit. Last year when Marc Andre Fleury (who wasn’t playing well at the time) went down with injury, Ty Conklin came to the rescue. If Malkin was the MVP of the team last year then Conklin was 1B. Conklin faced 31 shots a game and led the league in the best save percentage. He literally kept the Penguins in games they had no business being in. There was one game against the Islanders where he stopped 50 out of 52 shots. Unfortunately for him, he was not able to enjoy the defensive benefits that would come at the trade deadline when the Pens acquired Defenseman Hal Gill, Dupuis, and two way player Marian Hossa. It was around the trade deadline when Marc Andre Fleury returned from a 3 month injury. During the Pens last 10-15 games if the season, they began holding opponents to only 25 shots a game. This was a 6 shot difference from their season long average of giving up 31 shots. An amazing improvement if you will from a defensive standpoint. Fleury has received a new contract and quite a few accolades from the media since his return. He has played well. Very well. But Conklin had the best save percentage in the league when the Penguins were at pre trade deadline and still giving up about the 4th most shots per game in the league. Imagine what things will be like in Detroit for Conklin where the Wings nearly impenetrable defense only allows about 22 shots per game in average. For Conklin, this will be like having played a Video game at the expert level for a year, and then switching down and playing on the beginners level. The game will have slowed down for him. My prediction is that you will see a goalie controversy in Detroit next year after the 35 year old Osgood gets hurt and Detroit is forced to put Conklin in the lineup. It is signings like this , the help Detroit maintain a front office superiority over most of the teams.

A Tribute to Carson Palmer

June 27th, 2008

STEELERS 24 BENGALS 10

Bengals QB Carson Palmer completed only 39 percent of his passes (17 for 44).

“It’s a loss that doesn’t sit well with us,” coach Marvin Lewis said. “We just didn’t get things done. We had some chances. We didn’t make some third downs. … We missed some throws, and that ended up being the difference.”
———————————————————————————————————————
49ERS 20 - BENGALS 13
The Bengals could not get on track offensively, and that ultimately cost them in a 20-13 loss at San Francisco on Saturday night. ——————————————————————————————————
CHIEFS 27 BENGAlS 20
Say what you want about the beleaguered Bengals defense, but it was the struggling offense that hurt the Bengals at Arrowhead Stadium on Sunday. We’re just not doing what we need to do on third down,” said quarterback Carson Palmer, “It’s a key point in the game. I know I need to do better on third down. It’s the quarterback’s responsibility.” —————————————————————————————————————–
STEELERS 24 BENGALS 13
That’s why they’re 5-2 and we’re 2-5,” Bengals receiver T.J. Houshmandzadeh said. “Good teams put it in the end zone. Teams like us kick field goals.” “You have to remember what’s been going on and what is going on in the man’s head. We haven’t been converting on third down,” Jones said. “Us as an offense on third down, we have to give that man confidence to know and to understand that we’re going to go in there and do it. We haven’t been doing that. That’s not that man’s fault for making that call.” ——————————————————————————————————————-
BILLS 33 BENGALS 21
Cincinnati’s offense sputtered down the stretch, managing 22 yards and one first down on its first three possessions of the fourth quarter. “We’re just not a very good football team,” quarterback Carson Palmer said. “I don’t have words for the way we feel in this locker room about this game, about this season. And it’s frustrating.”

Ben Roethcareer 3rd down passing

90.3 Passer rating
62% completion percentage
8.2 Yards per attempt

CARSON PALMER CAREER 3RD DOWN PASSING

80% passer rating
59% PERCENT COMPLETION PERCENTAGE
6.5 YARDS PER ATTEMPT

NOTE: Huge Difference between 8.2 yards per attempt and 6.5
———————————————————————-

BEN ROETH 1ST QUARTER PASSING CAREER

105% PASSER RATING
9.4 YARDS PER ATTEMPT

CARSON PALMER 1ST QTR PASSING CAREER

93% PASSER RATING
7.2 YARDS PER ATTEMPT
————————————————————————-

BEN ROETH 4TH QTR PASSING CAREER

PASSER RATING 85%
7.7 YARDS PER ATTEMPT

cARSON palmer Career 4th QTR passing

PASSER RATING 79%
6.3 YARDS PER ATTEMPT
————————————————————————

BEN ROETH CAREER YARDS PER ATTEMPT AVG on all passes

8.1

PALMER CAREER YARDS PER ATTEMPT AVG on all passes
7.3
————————————————————————

BEN ROETH CAREER FUMBLES, FUMBLES LOST, INTERCEPTIONS

18 FUMBLES, 8 FUMBLES LOST, 54 INTERCEPTIONS

CARSON CAREER FUMBLES, FUMBLES LOST, INTERCEPTIONS

27 FUMBLES, 12 FUMBLES LOST , 63 INTERCEPTIONS
————————————————————————————

BEN ROETH CAREER PASSER RATING During Night Games

100.7%

CARSON PALMER CAREER PASSER RATING During Night Games

75%
————————————————————–

Ben Roeth passer rating indoors

111%

Carson passer rating indoors

96%
—————————————————————–

Ben roeth Passer Rating during PERCIPITATION

95%

Carson Passer Rating During Percipitation

74%
———————————————————————-

Ben Roeth career Passer rating when Temperature is between 20-40 Degrees Fahrenheit

88%

Carson palmer career Passer rating When Temperature is between 20-40 Degrees Fahrenheit

77%
——————————————————————————–

Ben roeth Career Passer Rating when Temp is above 80 degrees

111.1 %

Carson palmer Career Passer rating when Temp is above 80 Degress

110.8
—————————————————————————

Ben Roeth Career passer rating in December

95%

Carson Palmer Career Passer rating in December

84%
————————————————————————–

Ben Roeth Career Rushing Yardage total and per carry average

515 yards , 3.3 per carry

Carson Palmer Career rushing Yardage Total and per carry Average

135 yards, 1.3 per carry
—————————————————————————-

Ben Roeth Career Passer rating on Turf

96%

Carson Palmer Career Passer rating on Turf

89%
————————————————————————

Ben Roeth passer Rating on 3rd Down & 8-10 Yards

90%

Carson Palmer Passer rating on 3rd down & 8-10 Yards

71%

I did not include over all passing yards because that is not a very telling stat as the Steelers go into operation shutdown in the 2nd half when they have the lead.
TD passes are also a product of the two teams. The Bengals like throw the ball near the goaline to their tall receivers. The Steelers primarily have liked to run the ball near the goaline.

Next time you hear that Carson Palmer is a better passer, please tell the messenger smartmonies factually disagrees.

2008 STANLEY CUP FINALS PREDICTION

May 22nd, 2008

   If the NHL can’t market this series, then it may be time for the league to forget marketing all together. In just two days, perhaps the greatest collection of talent that we have ever seen will be displayed on the ice in Joe Louis arena. The Red wings come into this series as the leagues most dominant team. They had 115 points on the season as well as the best won/loss record. But their dominance was clear and deep. Take a look at the following stats that the Wings compiled this year.

They are Ranked #1 in the NHL IN SHOTS PER GAME

They are Ranked #1 in the NHL IN FEWEST SHOTS ALLOWED

They are Ranked #1 in the NHL IN SHOTS ON GOAL DIFFERENTIAL

They are Ranked #1 in the NHL 5 ON 5 PLAY  GOALS FOR AND AGAINST

They are Ranked #1 in the NHL FOR WIN PERCENTAGE AFTER LEADING IN 1ST PERIOD

They are Ranked #1 in the NHL FOR FACE OFF WIN PERCENTAGE

They are Ranked #1 in the NHL FOR WIN PERCENTAGE IN GAMES WHERE THEY SCORED 1ST

They are Ranked #1 in the NHL FOR WIN PERCENTAGE WHEN OUTSHOOTING OPPONENT

THEY ARE RANKED #1 IN THE NHL FOR GOALS AGAINST AVERAGE DIFFERENTIAL

THEY ARE RANKED #1 IN THE NHL FOR THE BEST +/- OF ANY TEAM AT HOME

THEY ARE RANKED #1 IN THE NHL FOR THE BEST +/- OF ANY TEAM ON THE ROAD

THEY ARE RANKED #1 IN THE NHL WITH 115 POINTS ON THE SEASON

THEY ARE RANKED #1 IN THE NHL FOR BEST RECORD VS SAGARIN TOP TEN TEAMS END OF REG

THEY ARE RANKED #1 IN THE NHL PLAYOFFS IN SHOTS ON GOAL PER GAME

THEY ARE RANKED #1 IN THE NHL PLAYOFFS IN SHOTS ON GOAL DIFFERENTIAL

THEY ARE RANKED #2 IN THE NHL PLAYOFFS IN 5 ON 4 GOALS

THEY ARE RANKED #1 IN THE NHL PLAYOFFS IN MOST SHORT HANDED GOALS

THEY ARE FIRST TEAM TO REACH CONF FINALS.

About the only stat the Redwings are not dominant in is shooting percentage. But they get so many shots per game, it doesn’t really matter. The Power play is another area where they are somewhat average. But that’s not a problem because they were the best 5 on 5 team in the league this season.  The Red wings are a dynasty. They are a team that has 6 players who won a cup together in 2001. They have made the playoffs 17 straight years.  The Redwings have been the best team from the start of the season and they enter the Stanley cup finals with a 12-4 record.   But the stat I’d like to focus on most is shots on goal differential. The following is a list of all Stanley cup champions going back to 1990. The list will show you that we haven’t had a Stanley cup winner with a regular season ending shots on goal differential average that was in the NEGATIVE since the 1990 season.

1990 Pens 90-91 = 30-34 = -4*** (Last time a team finished regular season with Negative Shots on goal differential , yet still went on to win cup)

1991 pens 91-92 = 31-30 = +1

1992 pens 92-93 = 34-32 = +2

1993 Montreal 93-94 = 32-30 = +2

1994 New Jersey 94-95 = 30 - 25 = +5

1995 Colorado 95-96 = 32 - 28 = +4

1996 Detroit 96-97 = 33 - 25 = +8

1997 DETROIT 97-98 = 30-25 = +5

1998 DALLAS 98 99 = 27 - 23 = +4

1999 NEW JERSEY 99-00 = 32 - 25 = +7

2000 COLORADO = 00-01 = 29 - 25 = +4

2001 DETROIT 01-02 = 30 -26 = +4

2002 NEW JERSEY 02-03 = 31 - 23 = +8

2004 TAMPA BAY 03-04 = 30 -25 = +5

2005 CAROLINA 05-06 = 31 - 30 = +1

2006 ANAHEIM 06-07 = 30 - 26 = +4

2007/2008  Redwings +11   2007/2008  Penguins  -2.0

Take a look at the mighty Red wings. I went back years and couldn’t find Shots on goal differential that was better than +11. Penguin’s center and 20 yr vet Gary Roberts said, “Playoff hockey isn’t about fancy goals, it’s about getting pucks to the net.”  Roberts is spot on. Take a look at the west conf finals that just took place. The Stars had the top shooting percentage in the league this year at 11%. They also had Turco in net, a superb goalie. But the Redwings just ran rough shot over the Stars. Go back last year to the playoffs. The Sabres had the best record mainly due to their  12% shooting percentage.  But they finished the regular season with a -1.5 shots on goal differential. They won the first two rounds of the playoffs but met the Senators who finished with a +4.  They got drilled in 5 games. While the sabres and Stars possessed a great shooting percentage, it just didn’t hold up in the playoffs when push came to shove.  So here we have a redwings team that is something like 21-8 against the Sagarin Top ten teams. They had the leagues best record and most points. They had the best plus/minus at home and on the road of any team. They were the best 5 on 5 team in the league. They were ranked #1 with the best face off percentage. They have the most short handed goals so far in the playoffs. And they have one of the all time great shots on goal differential averages we have ever seen.  The Redwings are team that is extremely talented defensively that simply does not allow many shots. And once they get the puck, they have numerous skill players that can maintain possession better then any team in the league.    The Pittsburgh Penguins are the leagues next dynasty. They hit the jackpot a few years ago when they drafted Sidney Crosby, Gino Malkin, Jordan Staal , and Marc Andre Fleury in successive years. They also have a slew of other #1 picks that finally have reached their potential. While none of them have the star power of the three mentioned above , but the Penguins would not be in this position if it weren’t for guys like Ryan Malone, & Brooks Orpik. The Penguins lose Gary Roberts, Eaton, Fleury,  Crosby for an extended period of time this season.  The Penguins appeared to be in major trouble. But two things happened. Backup goalie Ty Conklin came in and faced 31 shots a game and led the league in best save percentage. One game in particular against the Islanders, he stopped 50 out of 52 shots. The other thing that happened was that Evengi Malkin became one of the best players in the world during Crosby’s absence. He would not let the Penguins lose. He and Conklin would not let the Penguins lose.  They were something like 13-4 at one point without Crosby. That is hard to figure.  This showed how deep the Penguins were however. If you had any doubt before, there was little doubt afterwards. Crosby would eventually return, but the Penguins were not yet at a championship level. That came at the trade deadline when they traded for Sniper  Hossa and defensive players  Dupuis and Gill. What took everyone by surprise is that they actually got three defensive players in that trade. Hossa has been an astonishingly great two way player for the Penguins. It took a while for Hossa and Crosby to get on the same page. That didn’t happen until they were playing together on a regular basis at the start of the playoffs. But the defense was noticeably better by seasons end. They gave up 31 shots a game for the entire season. But the Penguins defense only allowed 26 shots a game in the final 10 games. This was a sign they were ready for playoff hockey.  In fact, if you look at the shots on goal differential rankings I posted above, you will see the Penguins finished with a -2.0 by seasons end. But the Penguins were a different team by season’s end. I say that literally. They returned one of the best players in world to the line up in Sidney Crosby.  Crosby missed about 2 months of the season. Hossa wasn’t on the team until the trade deadline. And even Hossa missed some games with injury. Defensive players Gill and Dupuis were also not with the team until the after the trade deadline. Defensive player Gary Roberts missed nearly the entire season but would return for start of Ottawa series. Penguins had a different roster by seasons end. Therefore those stats simply do not apply to this team. In fact, the ironic part of all of this, is that 2007/2008 Penguins resemble the 1990-1991 Penguins who finished the season with a -4.0 shots on goal differential  but became a championship team at the trade deadline when they got Ron Francis and Ulf Samuelsson. In the playoffs , the Penguins have a  +5 shots on goal differential. They are getting 32 shots a game and allowing  27. This is a 7 point difference from the regular  season.  Perhaps some of that is due to the fact that they played Ottawa in the first round. Ottawa had the worst record in the league since January. They were injury riddled and simply did not resemble the same team that started the season so impressively. But never the less the Penguins have made important strides in those Shots on goal area.                                                                                                                             TALE OF THE TAPE
Let’s take a look at how these two teams matchup statistically. Here are the playoffs stats so far. 
             
Offensive Shots on Goal
Wings = 36                                                     

Pens  = 32

Defensive Shots on Goal
Wings= 23                                                     

Pens = 27

Shooting Percentage
Wings =  9.2%                                                  

Pens =  11.0%

Shooting Percentage Allowed
Wings = 8.2%                                                   

Pens  = 6.7%

FACE Off win percentage
Wings  = 55%                                                    

Pens   = 46%

Power play conversion percentage
Wings = 21.5%                                                   

Pens  = 24.5 %


Power play conversion percentage allowed defensively
Wings  =  12.7%                                                 
Pens   = 13.0%

Shorts Handed Goals scored
Wings  = 5                                                      

pens   = 1

Shorts Handed Goals allowed
Wings  = 0                                                      

Pens   = 1

5 on 5 goals for and against Ratio  
Wings  = 1.48                                                   

Pens   = 1.71

Number of 1st Period Goals
Wings = 23                                                      

Pens  = 14

Goals  for and against Differential
Wings  = +1.50                                                  

Pens   = +1.78

Goalie save Percentage
Osgood  = 93.1%                                                 

Fleury  = 93.8%

Win Percentage when Leading  after  1st  Period
Wings =  91%                                                   

Pens  = 100%

Win Percentage when Leading after 2nd Period
Wings  = 100%
Pens   = 100%

Average Power rating of opponents played in the playoffs
Wings = 3.4                                                     

Pens = 3.0

    When looking at the playoff stats, a few things stand out to me. The first is Face off percentage. The Wings have a clear edge in this category. Which means, the Penguins power play and possibly their power play kill will be affected.  When they are on the Power play  they will lose precious minutes chasing the puck down the ice after the Wings win the face off. The other issue is that Fleury will most likely see more shots in this series.  If the Wings are winning face off’s on their power plays, they can use their incredible puck possession skills to keep the puck in the Pittsburgh defensive zone, thus getting more shots on goal. How will Fleury handle this? He’s been super solid in the playoffs so far. But he’s going to get tested by the red wings. Thomas Holdstrom will play a key role in front of the net.   

The other stat I notice is Goals scored in the 1st period. Take a look at the win percentage of both teams when they are ahead after the 1st and 2nd period.  Another words you’re not going to make a living in this series if you fall behind. Both teams have developed a system to maintain the leads and suffocate opponents.  The Redwings have scored 9 more 1st period goals in the playoffs. I’d also like to point out that against the Rangers, the Penguins were outshot on the road in games 3 and 4 by a total of 27 shots. In fact the Penguins numbers drop off more on the road than do the Red wings when they are the road team.  Consider that the Redwings have the best record in the league when they outshoot the opponent. But they also have the worst record in the league when they get out shot.  Therefore, the Penguins getting outshot in NY by so much is very troubling.  Not winning face off’s , getting out shot, against a team that routinely jumps out quickly in the 1st period and then slams the door once they get the lead is not something you want if you’re the Penguins in Detroit. I think Detroit’s experience and ability to play much better on the road then do the Penguins, can play a huge role here. I think Detroit is a strong play in a game 1 at home. Below are the Shots on goal differential averages for each team on the road.

Wings  33 – 26 = +7 Shots on goal differential average in the playoffs on the road.                                

       

Pens    30 – 30 = 0 shots on goal differential  in the playoffs on the road

The Wings also have 4 Short handed goals on the road. The Pens have none. Those 4 short handed goals on the road for the Wings, tells me that home teams are most likely trying to put on a show for the hometown team and have lost their discipline and concentration against a great Defense. This is something to watch for with a young team like the Penguins when they comeback home for game 3.

List of things each team has going for them in this series.

Detroit

1)      Experience

2)      Better Shots on goal differential average

3)      Face off percentage

4)      Better play on the road

5)      Home ice advantage/ 1st period scoring.

Penguins

1)      Shooting percentage

2)      Shooting percentage allowed

3)      3 deep lines for Detroit to deal with

4)      More physical of the two teams

5)      Coaching (this guy does nothing wrong)

Conclusion
I think the longer this series goes, the more it favors the Penguins. I think if the Penguins can be no worse than 2-2 after 4 games, they could very well go on to win the series. I think the wings might be a shock to the system for the Penguins in game 1. This is easily the best team the Pens have faced. The Wings are super quick and extremely polished. It might take a while before the Penguins figure them out. The wings will have  their issues to deal with too. But remember, Dallas had a better shooting percentage than the penguins. They will be prepared. 

Prediction

I would hate to see the penguins lose in the finals. But at the beginning of the season, I predicted the Penguins to make it to the finals and lose. I’m going to stick with that prediction for better or worse. I just think the Penguins have to tighten the screws on little things like winning face off’s. Games like this tend to expose your weaknesses if you have any. Losing face off’s and giving up a short handed goal  can cost you a critical game at home and eventually you lose the series because of it. I also worry about Crosby and Malkin a bit in this series. They both have the tendency to do a little too much fancy passing. You just can’t do that against this lightning quick defense. That’s why I like Detroit early in this series.  Pens will have to figure things like that out.  Finally, I am interested to see how Crosby and Fleury play . Its possible Fleury could finally have a bad series.  He’s going to see shots. More shots than he is used to seeing . It will also be interesting to see how Crosby plays. The Rangers were a poor mans Red wings. Crosby did not play well against the Rangers. He always plays well against the flyers. So anointing him after the Flyers series is being short sighted in my opinion. It excused him of his poor series against the Rangers. The rangers anticipated many of his passes and if they weren’t such a poor shooting team, they would have capitalized more often on those turnovers. The red wings are a cerebral bunch. Not to mention an ultra fast defense. Crosby is going to need to look for his shot  just as much as the pass in my opinion.

Oh well , I hope I’m wrong.  Wings in six games.
                     

 

 

SPYGATE (what’s all the fuss about?)

May 21st, 2008

   At the 2001 AFC championship post-game news conference with the players, Steelers WR receiver Hines Ward was asked what went wrong with the offense. Ward said that the Patriots were calling out their plays at the line of scrimmage. He said that he had never seen a team do that before. At the end of the 2004 championship game, LB Teddy Brusci was asked why did coach Belichick pull him over to the sideline  before a critical 4th down a 1. Brusci said Belichick saw something and that he didn’t want to say anymore than that. Brusci stuffed Bettis on the 4th and 1 causing a fumble, as he completely anticipated the play.  Before the 2004 Super bowl, Tom Brady was asked how he was able to rip apart a steeler Defense that gave every other team so much trouble in that particular season, Brady said “when you have the answers to the test before you take it, its easy.”  A week later Brady went on to win his 3rd Super bowl. After that game, Eagles defensive back remarked that every time they called a blitz, the Patriots would throw a screen pass. He said he had never seen anything like it. Bill Cowher once was asked what makes the Patriots so good. He replied, “You like the matchups going in, but it just doesn’t seem to work out the way on the field, for some reason.”

 In the opening week of the 2007 NFL season, the New England Patriots were caught filming opposing team’s signals.   

Tom Brady’s #1 trait as a QB is his ability to read a defense quickly. You hear it every week at nausea from the announcers, analysts, publications, sports writers and fans about Brady’s ability to process information so quickly and get rid of the ball. He was able to beat some of the best defenses by throwing check down passes time and time again. He always seems to be able to find the open guy. This is what Brady is all about. He never needed a lot of talent like he currently has. He can take scrub Wide receivers, TE’s, and a bunch of pass catching backs, and complete 10-12 consecutive passes in a championship atmosphere. Belichick is known as a defensive Genius. He put together a game plan that thwarted a juggernaut Buffalo Bills offense way back in 1990. He kept the Rams out of the end zone for three quarters in the 2001 Super bowl.  He routinely turned Peyton Manning and the Colts offense into a laughing stock. These were three of the very best offenses we have ever seen. His offensive coordinator Charlie Weiss, was given millions to coach Notre Dame. why? Cause they felt he was an offensive genius for his work with the mediocre talent on offense that he had to work with  in New England.Don’t confuse the 2007 Patriots with the 2001 Patriots. Writers and fans alike do this all the time. They say that the video taping must not have mattered, because after the Patriots were caught, they went on to win 17 straight games. But the 2007 Patriots were heavily talented. Especially on the offensive side of the ball. They had the 2nd greatest WR that ever lived. Two of the most prolific offenses ever, the 1998 Vikings and 2007 Patriots both displayed Randy Moss on the field. The 2007 Patriots also had brought over Donovan Mcnaabs #1 Wide Receiver in Daunte Stallworth. Wes Welker became a huge addition as a slot receiver. They already had the Pass catching RB’s and Tight End Ben watson in Place.  But however, the 2001 Patriots were very limited offensively. They had no business being on the super bowl. Let alone beating one of the great offensive teams of all time. Don’t believe me that the 2001 Patriots were not worthy? Take a look at the following rankings based on offensive yards per play and defensive yards per play. We subtracted the two and get yards per play differential.  

1999 RAMS       6.5 4.7 = +1.8

1979 STEELERS 5.8 4.1 = +1.7

1989 49ERS      6.1 4.7 = +1.4

1991 REDSKINS 5.8 4.5 = +1.3

1996 PACKERS  5.3 4.2 = +1.1

1992 COWBOYS  5.5 4.5 = +1.0

1988 49ERS    5.5 4.5 = +1.0

1998 BRONCOS 5.9 4.9 = +1.0

1985 BEARS    5.4 4.4 = +1.0

1984 49ERS    6.0 5.0 = +1.0